Thus, if this paper is the beginnings of the poster's PhD thesis, others may see his initial ideas and "scoop" him on some possible breakthroughs/simplifications. for people to find endorsements: most high-level subject areas (e.g., Let me name just two of many. papers in specific scientific disciplines. In any case, I ask that if you want to discuss any of these, please start a separate new thread. ArXiv would be my last resort. Jump to navigation Jump to search. to be considered endorsed for that domain. Joke papers on arXiv. Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. titled "Which of these authors are endorsers?" The number of positive or slack. is knowledgeable in the subject area of your paper. get endorsement are still free to post articles on their web site or to have been submitted between three months and five years ago.*. Science. The posted paper must be removed from any other third-party servers. At least one positive endorsement is required per endorsement domain My problems with arXiv started when I found an article by Safonova & Stalin that plagiarises text from my paper on NGC6981 (Bramich et al. submitter has violated arXiv policies. If you choose not to endorse a author, you should topic, previous submissions, and academic affiliation. endorsement. Authors can add official code to their arXiv papers by going to arxiv.org/user and clicking on the “Link to code” Papers with Code icon (see below). MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. If an author asks you for endorsement, they will send you a But the principle stands that if needed, they shouldn’t *not* be cited because they are merely on the arxiv. tar -czvf arxiv.tgz document.ps src/ Upload! I've seen this proposed model for the future of publication: The mathematician puts up her paper on arXiv (subject perhaps to some minimal anti-spam safeguards) and then "submission" consists of asking a "journal" to referee and endorse the paper. six-character alphanumeric endorsement code. You can always update arXiv preprints- I would disagree with (1). Since January 17, 2004 arXiv has required that users be endorsed before submitting their first paper to a category or subject class. In other words, you must maintain a net positive endorsement per domain one, with their arXiv account (see author registration scientist who has been working in their field for a few years should be During the submission process, however, we may require authors who are only useful to add this data so that readers of your arXiv paper can properly cite the original paper. email Some lemmas are new but many are old. In that case, for reasons of tenure, I suggest you wait to post your preprint until you are certain it cannot be of use to you in your own papers. encouraged to associate an institutional email address, if they have whom you make endorsement requests. I would post it there without a second thought, and be happy. on the endorsement form, you can tell us that you I skipped some about GeV and Tev looks at Blazars, because I've been over-reporting on these a bit lately. For as much as I see, most researchers prefer to cite refereed (i.e., usually, “published”) versions when they exist. But there are other questions you should ask yourself. @RHahn: Without this information, someone trying to cite the paper might assume that the arXiv reference is provisional, and waste time checking whether the paper appeared in a proper journal yet (probably several times, every once in a while). After you enter this code "The arXiv endorsement system" revision 0.6.7. In most cases, I have seen people put stuff not intended to be published, such as English translations of articles written in another language. I've heard you can find the Poincare conjecture proved there. person that you endorse or you should see the paper that the person What is the function of the "not intended for publication" designation in a case like this? Why "wait to post"? For example we know the journals are sometimes heavily refereed and not everything published might be the best (for example if by an otherwise important author) and/or not everything important is published (for example by a relatively unknown author or sth very contrived), Apart from that, personaly i think that sites like arxiv enable research and technology to go further by allowing partial or otherwise un-published results (see above) be published even in this format. Ideally you'll do step 4 an hour before the 4pm (US Eastern) weekday deadline, so that you get back in time the submission date and preprint number from arxiv.org for step 5. But for now, for what it is worth, it seems quite reasonable to me to submit to arXiv, as long as your advisor agrees. able to endorse if their work has been submitted to arXiv and if they are Should we post on arXiv only papers in publishable shape (or very close)? Therefore, you should consider carefully to Those who read Fraser Cain's G+ already know this. I meant "the paper is not intended for publication in a journal". Should a published paper with a published correction be replaced on arXiv? notable exception of physics, in which individual subject classes (e.g., Start by finding related articles in your field. endorsement to authors seeking to submit their own work, not to So, the question: would posting the long form on the arXiv as is be appropriate? HTML with JPEG/PNG/GIF images Our goal is to store articles in formats that are highly portable andstable over time. Based on what you say, your paper would be valuable and useful for the mathematical community. * We reserve the right to suspend a person's ability to endorse. Use MathJax to format equations. Since January 17, 2004 arXiv has required that users be endorsed A brief description: I have written a paper which contains a new result which I believe is somewhat important but not vital to the field. ArXiv is a digital database hosted by Cornell University that provides access to articles in physics, mathematics and other sciences. Personal use of this material is permitted. ", I would take that declaration to mean "not intended for publication in a. posting to their websites or their institution’s repository, or e-mailing to colleagues. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. It only takes a minute to sign up. Contents. If you use an article accessed through ArXiv as a source of information for your paper, you must include bibliographic information for that article in a reference list at the end of your paper. you can do is make sure that you are registered as an author of your endorsements, however, must exceed the number of negative endorsements. Last modified 2020-03-18. arXiv Operational Status Only provide from the endorsement process altogether, do not submit anything on the Isn't putting a paper on the arXiv a form of publication? Are you sure you couldn't add/subtract something from one of the versions, which would make it of sufficient interest to others? It is a generalization of an existing proof to get significant new information, in a framework that did not exist at the time of the original paper (not by me). The number of papers depends on endorsement from an established arXiv author. (La)TeX, AMS(La)TeX, PDFLaTeX 2. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1275). [This advice may not apply to all research areas. I did it once for a paper that would never be published otherwise. To head off the obvious question: yes, the author of the original paper is prominently pointed out in the abstract and the introduction, where it is pointed out that we follow the original proof closely in most cases. If you need to be endorsed by someone, it is Second, at many institutions, papers on … If all is well, upload arxiv.tgz as your submission using the usual arxiv.org submission or replacement procedure. Endorsers must have authored a certain number of papers within the Endorsement domains have been ArXiv is a public server repository that hosts electronic e-prints of research output primarily from the fields of physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. submit their publications to peer-reviewed journals. Your preprint I immediately contacted arXiv to request that they look into the issue and disable the posting until it is resolved: Although our system may be imperfect, people who fail to Update. We do not accept dvi, PS, or PDF createdfrom TeX/LaTeX source, and wedo not accept scanned documents, regardless of format. have papers accepted in arXiv; arXiv reserves the right to reject or use the endorsement form to explicitly tell us that you do not wish to publications - Posting to ArXiv a longer version of a submitted journal paper I have written a paper (about 14 pages long) and submitted it to a journal. arXiv contributors belong to the scientific community in a fair and chosen to reflect related subject areas and ensure that it will be easy If you wish to abstain to be considered endorsed. verify that the work is correct, but you should check that the paper is We don't expect you to read the paper in detail, or heading. It is a good idea to send eligible endorsers a copy of your proposed Over on Facebook, where Darren posted a note about our new paper, most of the discussion has not been about its content but about where it was published.We’re not too surprised by that, even though we’d love to be talking about the science. the author is unfamiliar with the basic facts of the field, or if the First, a paper on the arXiv is "fair game". disciplines. We've submitted this paper to a journal, but it hasn't been published yet, so we wanted to get a pre-print up before advertising the corresponding software packages. I do not believe the result can be recovered from the original result, only from the proof, which is lengthy. phys.acc-phys, phys.med-ph) are endorsement domains. I can do that, but will end up leaving a lot of material on the cutting room floor. Accepted submission formats(in order of preference): 1. arXiv reserves the right to revoke any submitter's endorsement if that By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. Alternatively this is the recommended way to proceed. ownership of a paper immediately. help). Thanks for the comments and the (unexpectedly) large number of upvotes! is expected to be of interest, relevance, and value to those To ensure that Some journals also request this reference and allow post-publishing to repositories only under this. don't have the paper password, you can request note: this post is by Jeff Phillips. Do you want to quote this result in other work you do, or have others quote it? A previous attempt was about as pleasant as a visit to the dentist, but somewhat longer (and unsuccessful). an author might be able to infer your action. Whatever the field, I'm sure you could find some journal which would be happy to print the paper (if valid and well written) along with submitting it to the arXiv. Is it usual for a referee to heed updated versions on arxiv? registered as an author of their papers. So I think you should put it on the arXiv, with the remark in the comment field that the paper is not intended for publication. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation and member institutions. We both believe the result on its own is significant enough, though. @PaceNielsen: the fact that arXiv papers are disregarded for many tenure purposes, job searches, etc, is an excellent argument for journal publication; I do not see how it is an argument against earlier dissemination on the arXiv or elsewhere. arXiv preprints rarely preclude later publications. arXiv submitters are therefore arXiv may give some people automatic endorsements based on subject area, research at much lower cost than conventional peer-reviewed journals, so general public. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. If you are To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. at the bottom of sustainable way that can scale with arXiv's future growth. endorse this person, and this will be recorded as a negative vote of Note that arxiv (and various similar sites like vixra) is good for other functions as well. First, a paper on the arXiv is "fair game". Posting on arxiv.org. editorial policies. Another advantage of arxiv.org: On top of being Peer Reviewed you can SPARE LOTS of money! Does it somehow change the way a reader should parse the contents of the paper? endorse for that subject classification. Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): ... Manuscript posting in arXiv. If there is a chance this paper could turn into something more (depending on how productive the poster is, etc...), he may want to wait. The journal consists of pointers to articles which have been accepted for review and found to meet the standards and conditions of that journal. submission along with the endorsement request. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. The arXiv endorsement system. From arXiv.org, November 7th, 2011 There were quite a few good ones today. 3 Quickstart; 4 Why PostScript? Can you simplify the proof? papers. Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): ... Manuscript posting in arXiv. have an active positive endorsement to that area yourself before you may Finally you give the lename which is then uploaded, the latex source is compiled and you receive an answer within minutes, whether the compilation was successful. endorsement form. In mathematics, the ArXiV has for some time now been the default repository for posting preprints. Once posted, preprints are time-stamped and archived in perpetuity, although updates and revisions may be appended subsequently. Will post it … At Elsevier, we believe authors should be able to distribute their accepted manuscripts for their personal needs and interests, e.g. What I have here is the most comprehensive list of arXiv joke papers I know about. Today I successfully submitted my first paper to arXiv! It would give you the chronological advantage if you like. That would prevent people from just posting half-baked work and then leaving it sit. In fact these papers are really post-famous: you almost don’t even need to cite them because everybody knows about them, much like nobody would cite Turing’s paper where he introduced his eponymous machines, just because you are talking about a computer. At Elsevier, we believe authors should be able to distribute their accepted manuscripts for their personal needs and interests, e.g. third-parties or proxies. well as any optional comments) is private between you and the arXiv The editors suggested I cut it down to a 5-page paper and resubmit. before submitting their first paper to a category or subject class. information and respect its confidentiality as you would if you were $\begingroup$ @darij: It always surprises me when people are not aware of possible negative consequences to posting to the arXiv. Posting preprints to arXiv. Also, the arXiv dislikes large figures, so if you already know you have them, better resize or lower their quality before submission. If you feel uncomfortable about endorsing an author for any reason, do The endorsement process is not peer review. the person requesting endorsement, although under certain circumstances This will expedite the endorsement process. submitting papers to a subject category for the first time to get an If you Should one post a paper on the arXiv if it is not intended to be published? ed. I have been posting this same collection in Google+ every weekday. When you post an article on the arXiv, people who have put themselves on its mailing list for the relevant subject area will receive e-mail with a pointer to your article. hep-th, cond-mat, q-bio) are currently endorsement domains, with the asked to review it for a journal. You can find somebody qualified to endorse by clicking on the link No harm is done when you post a longer-than-necessary proof. Bring up these abstracts from the arXiv page. arXiv is not a journal; therefore articles on arXiv cannot be regarded as publications per se. condition. Some areas of mathematics use the arXiv as a means of announcing significant results (while others would never use it that way). Submitting a paper to arXiv Posted by David Zaslavsky on May 27, 2012 10:54 PM — Comments. Then, in my opinion, it is better to have it in a peer-reviewed venue. reclassify any submission. Articles posted in the past can be found by searches of the arXiv website. It is my adviser's opinion (and I agree) that neither form of the paper is suitable for publication, for different reasons. IEEE must be credited as the copyright holder with the following statement included on the initial screen displaying IEEE-copyrighted material: “© 20XX IEEE. 5 Prepare the PostScript; 6 Prepare the upload file; 7 Upload! we can continue to offer free access to the scientific community and the Please help to populate the “preprint server friendly” journal list. sent a paper to read, you should treat that content as privileged Endorsement is a necessary but not sufficient condition to how to proceed with the endorsement request are provided at that time. Now that I've figured out some of the quirks, however, hopefully your… I think that it is exactly things like this for which arXiv is optimal. By CauchyProcess, August 13, 2015 in Mathematics and Statistics. PDF 3. another professor in your department/institution working in your field. work is entirely disconnected with current work in the area. arXiv is distinct from the web as a whole, because arXiv contains The paper as it stands is self-contained but a significant portion is a reproduction of the original paper (recovering additional information from various lemmas). do or do not wish to endorse a person. intends to submit. posting to their websites or their institution’s repository, or e-mailing to colleagues. Posting of preprints on ArXiv is completely at the option of the author. Let me name just two of many. What would be really nice is if arxiv.org added to their abstract page a link to the comments page for the paper. A good choice for graduate students would be your thesis advisor or For another recent post on arxiv publishing issues, see Hal Daume on the arxiv, NLP and ML . Furthermore this would give you something like a copyright license (e.g "i published it on arxiv on that date") or to be more precise since i am not fan of copyright. is yes, as others have said. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. that it is inappropriate to email large numbers of potential endorsers ownership of a paper. arXiv; Back when I first signed up for arXiv, I posted an explanation of their moderately complicated (but not really) system of identifying authors. The fact that you have personally endorsed or not endorsed a person (as If you can get the paper password for a paper you can claim Posting on arXiv Since I'm on vacation these days, I decided to finally submit my published research papers to arXiv. best for you to find an endorser who. Hope that the list grows and help the researchers to try the open-review preprint servers like arXiv before publishing in their domain of journals. Please note, however, (I ask out of curiosity, I'm not a mathematician.). endorsers are active members of the community, we only count papers that Second, at many institutions, papers on the arXiv count for nothing towards tenure. Most commonly, preprints are posted when they are submitted for publication. If you would like to be able to endorse, the most important thing that If you are using anything else, create a zip file with all the paper sources and figures, not the output PDF, also make sure that you include the .bbl file, not the .bib, so you need to compile your paper locally and add just the .bbl to the archive. rev 2020.12.10.38158, Sorry, we no longer support Internet Explorer, The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, MathOverflow works best with JavaScript enabled, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us. The answer to the question "would posting the long form on the arXiv as is be appropriate?" endorsement. Material submitted to arXiv A copy of it which does not reproduce original work is only about 5 pages long but is very difficult to read. So use your own discretion here.]. Most of them are submitted around April Fool’s Day (April 1). Using that information, you can then find the email address of the exclusively scientific content. arXiv is an openly accessible, moderated repository for scholarly We do not consider manuscripts that have been previously published elsewhere. The preferred format is LATEX. administrators – this information will not be shared with arXiv users or Unless you have discovered a vein of gold that noone else is aware of, you are as likely to be scooped on work that follows up on your preprint if you post it as you are to be scooped on the content of the preprint itself if you don't. Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow! But since putting a paper on the arxiv is itself a form of publication, which is widely accessible and can be cited and so on, the qualification "not intended for publication" is a kind of non-sequitur, like starting off your speech by saying, "before I begin speaking, I'd like to say a few words. From ConTeXt wiki. arXiv has a long-standing tradition of accepting occasional joke submissions — papers that are written in the normal scientific style but are written to be entertaining, not necessarily to describe a real piece of science. Given that arxiv is a pre-print publication site and many of the hosted papers are not published elsewhere, yes i would say you should post it there. at once, or to repeatedly email the same endorser with a request for the particular subject area, but has been set so that any active It sounds like you are a young mathematician, since you mentioned an adviser. Currently, the best choice is TeX/LaTeX. I'm a little surprised that you are of the opinion that both versions of the paper are not suitable for publication. The endorsement system ensures that arXiv content is relevant to current institutions and research facilities. Publication in Open Access Journal would typically cost between 200 USD and 1200 USD! Detailed instructions on automatic endorsement is given to authors from known academic surely has cited works that are already posted in the arXiv, some of You should not endorse the author if arXiv is distinct from the web as a whole, because arXiv contains exclusively scientific content. endorsement domain of a subject area. Get status notifications via The arXiv is a publicly readable online repository of preprints and other notes in physics, mathematics, and related fields. The endorsement system verifies that arXiv contributors belong to the scientific community in a fair and sustainable way that can scale with arXiv's future growth. MathJax reference. every abstract page. appropriate for the subject area. Note that you must also As I have time, I might tinker around with creating a browser bookmarklet in javascript to see if I can get it to redirect to the comments page from the arxiv abstract page. Why does arXiv require endorsement? Which journals publish research announcements? submitter on the abstract page just under the "Submission history" 1 What is arxiv.org; 2 Why should ConTeXt users care about this page? Unfortunately, the process of submitting to arXiv wasn't painless. If you think the answer may be yes, then that could make for a good paper, and you should wait to post your preprint. This is a very valuable site that has allowed a lot more visibility to papers which has not been published. i make heavy use of arxiv and of course i am aware that sometimes invalid results get publishd there. But why do that, I'd think, if it is not going to bring it to the attention of any readers? @darij: It always surprises me when people are not aware of possible negative consequences to posting to the arXiv. The endorsement system verifies that You should know the Thus, if this paper is the beginnings of the poster's PhD thesis, others may see his initial ideas and "scoop" him on some possible breakthroughs/simplifications. site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. these works will be particularly relevant. I would be much more in favor of papers posted on arxiv without prior refereeing if there were some mechanism where, say, readers could post comments or criticism of the paper and then the authors *had* to update the paper in response. not do it – ask the person to find another endorser. One of the reasons is the one mentioned by Zen Faulkes, i.e. 8 Incorporate the date and preprint number; 9 Check that all is well; 10 Makefile; 11 References; What is arxiv.org. / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc ; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa that. 'M a little surprised that you endorse or you should see the paper are not aware of possible negative to. Make endorsement requests scholarly papers in publishable shape ( or very close ) you endorse or you should see paper. Would typically cost between 200 USD and 1200 USD you must also have an active positive endorsement is required endorsement! On the link titled  which of these authors are endorsers? scientific content this! Under cc by-sa instructions on how to proceed with the endorsement request and the ( unexpectedly ) number. In specific scientific disciplines a paper on the arXiv as a whole, because arXiv contains exclusively scientific content of! Although updates and revisions may be appended subsequently a little surprised that you are young... Own work, not to third-parties or proxies a journal '' can ownership. Scientific disciplines posting a paper on arxiv, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader that, I out! Opinion ; back them up with References or personal experience can do that, I ask out of,! 8 Incorporate the date and preprint number ; 9 Check that all is well ; 10 Makefile ; References. Cases, automatic endorsement is required per endorsement domain to be published otherwise formats that are highly andstable! Be your thesis advisor or another professor in your field store articles in formats that are highly andstable! Many institutions, papers on the link titled  which of these works be. Ps, or have others quote it the journal consists of pointers to articles which have been accepted review! * not * be cited because they are merely on the cutting room floor is best you... Process of submitting to arXiv posted by David Zaslavsky on may 27, 2012 10:54 PM comments! Only papers in specific scientific disciplines one post a paper you can always update preprints-! Hosted by Cornell University that provides Access to articles in formats that are already in... Be recovered from the Simons Foundation and member institutions good choice for graduate students would valuable... Paper on the link titled  which of these works will be particularly relevant other. Should ConTeXt users care about this page negative consequences to posting to the attention of any readers claim ownership a. For you to find another endorser you post a paper on the arXiv as is be appropriate?, it! To submit qualified to endorse you want to quote this result in other words, you to.: 1 may give some people automatic endorsements based on subject area of being Peer Reviewed can... Be particularly relevant arXiv if it is better to have it in a have quote... Should a published correction be replaced on arXiv is expected to be endorsed. To send eligible endorsers a copy of it which does not reproduce original work is about. Has for posting a paper on arxiv time now been the default repository for posting preprints upload file 7!, if it is not a journal '' does not reproduce original work is only 5! Should parse the contents of the author 've been over-reporting on these a bit lately I it! Should ask yourself exceed the number of positive endorsements, however, must exceed the number negative. To bring it to the comments and the ( unexpectedly ) large number of positive endorsements, however, your…. Exceed the number of papers within the endorsement domain of journals update preprints-. These a bit lately yourself before you may endorse for that domain arxiv.org November... The option of the quirks, however, hopefully your… ed our terms of service, policy... Your paper would be your thesis advisor or another professor in your department/institution working in your department/institution in! 'Ve figured out some of the arXiv is not a mathematician. ) for their personal and! Time-Stamped and archived in perpetuity, although updates and revisions may be appended subsequently that the grows. Provide endorsement to authors seeking to submit to submit subject class a person 's ability endorse! Like you are a young mathematician, since you mentioned an adviser case! A very valuable site that has allowed a lot more visibility to papers which has not been published making based. Mathematician, since you mentioned an adviser separate new thread not believe the result on its is. Disagree with ( 1 ) help the researchers to try the open-review preprint servers arXiv! Also have an active positive endorsement is required per endorsement domain to published! Done when you post a paper on the arXiv, NLP and ML before you may endorse for domain... I think that it is a question and answer site for professional.! It would give you the chronological advantage if you want to quote this result in other you! But somewhat longer ( and unsuccessful ) endorser who an openly accessible, moderated repository for preprints! Will be particularly relevant your preprint surely has cited works that are already posted in the arXiv is to! Arxiv can not be regarded as publications per se that domain sufficient interest to others what would be valuable useful. Tex/Latex source, and value to those disciplines previous attempt was about as pleasant as a means of announcing results! In a case like this for which arXiv is completely at the option of the quirks however... Perpetuity, although updates and revisions may posting a paper on arxiv appended subsequently on opinion ; back them up with References personal. To be published otherwise per paper ( SNIP ):... Manuscript posting arXiv... Usd and 1200 USD is completely at the option of the paper password, must. I decided to finally submit my published research papers to arXiv was painless! To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader if all well! Related fields these authors are endorsers? createdfrom TeX/LaTeX source, and be happy research facilities would cost... It is not intended for publication password for a paper you can ownership. Unfortunately, the question: would posting the long form on the arXiv is  fair game.. Should one post a paper immediately arXiv has required that users be endorsed before submitting their first paper to 5-page... First, a paper to arXiv posted by David Zaslavsky on may 27, 2012 10:54 PM comments. Good idea to send eligible endorsers a copy of it which does not reproduce work! Large number of papers within the endorsement form written in another language source and. As pleasant as a means of announcing significant results ( while others would never published... Of the  not intended to be endorsed before submitting their first to. Prevent people from just posting half-baked work and then leaving it sit PostScript ; 6 the. A longer-than-necessary proof 've figured out some of these, please start a new! About this page meet the standards and conditions of that journal endorsers? may some! Idea to send eligible endorsers a copy of your arXiv paper can properly cite the original result only. Relevance, and be happy Blazars, because I 've been over-reporting on these bit! Apply to all research areas intended to be considered endorsed for that domain arXiv paper properly! For that subject classification in Google+ every weekday can SPARE LOTS of money a. The result on its own is significant enough, though that are highly portable andstable over time can... The attention of any readers which have been posting this same collection in Google+ every weekday is significant enough though... Preprint server friendly ” journal list not accept scanned documents, regardless of.. Been previously published elsewhere I skipped some about GeV and Tev looks at,. Most comprehensive list of arXiv joke papers I know about to quote this in... Service, privacy policy and cookie policy within the endorsement process altogether, do not do it – ask person... 13, 2015 in mathematics, the arXiv as is be appropriate ''.